Confidential tokenization platforms issue tokenized funds, securities, and real-world assets whose holder balances and transfers are encrypted onchain, keeping cap tables, holder lists, and redemption flows private. Supply and reserves stay auditable, and selective disclosure satisfies regulators without publishing investor data. Ryle provides the confidential asset infrastructure to build and operate these platforms.Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://ryle.sh/docs/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
The scenario
A tokenization platform issues regulated instruments — fund shares, treasury products, RWAs — and must keep investor positions confidential while proving supply, reserves, and compliance.Why public chains fail it
On a transparent chain, the cap table, holder list, and every redemption are public. This is the privacy problem of tokenized assets: it breaches confidentiality obligations and exposes investors and strategy.How confidentiality and selective disclosure solve it
Confidential digital assets encrypt holder balances and transfers while zero-knowledge proofs keep total supply and reserves verifiable. Selective disclosure gives regulators and auditors scoped, logged views into specific holders or transactions — without exposing the full cap table.What Ryle enables
- Issue confidential tokenized assets with encrypted holder positions.
- Keep cap tables, holder lists, and redemptions private.
- Prove supply and reserves; disclose specific holders to regulators on demand.
- Manage the program through the Console and integrate via APIs.
Related
- The privacy problem of tokenized assets
- Selective disclosure
- Confidential vs traditional tokens
- What are confidential digital assets?
FAQ
Can regulators audit a confidential tokenized asset?
Can regulators audit a confidential tokenized asset?
Yes. Selective disclosure provides scoped, time-bounded, audited views into specific holders or transactions, while the cap table stays private.
Is total supply still provable if holdings are private?
Is total supply still provable if holdings are private?
Yes. Zero-knowledge proofs keep supply and reserves verifiable even though individual holder balances are encrypted.