Skip to main content
Confidential assets and traditional tokens behave the same way functionally — both can be issued, transferred, and redeemed — but they differ on privacy. Traditional tokens (like standard ERC-20s) publish every balance and transfer in plaintext, while confidential assets encrypt those values onchain and use zero-knowledge proofs to keep them verifiable. Confidential assets also add compliance hooks, such as selective disclosure, that public tokens lack.

​
Side-by-side comparison

​
Privacy

A traditional token’s balances and transfers are readable by anyone. A confidential asset keeps them encrypted, so public blockchain exposure of treasury, counterparties, and flows is eliminated by default.

​
Verifiability

Public tokens are verifiable because everyone can read the state. Confidential assets achieve verifiability differently: zero-knowledge proofs confirm each transaction is valid without revealing the values.

​
Compliance

Traditional tokens have no disclosure mechanism — visibility is all-or-nothing. Confidential assets add selective disclosure, so issuers can prove specific activity to auditors and regulators on demand.

​
Performance and tooling

Both settle on EVM-compatible chains. With Ryle, the additional cryptography (proof generation, verification, circuits) is managed by the platform and gas is sponsored by a relayer, so the integration surface stays close to a familiar token workflow.

​
FAQ

Yes. Ryle supports a confidential layer on an asset you already issue, a brand-new confidential asset, or confidentiality on a third-party asset — all behind the same API.
They involve proof generation, but Ryle runs this in managed workers and sponsors gas via its relayer, so the operational experience stays close to a standard token integration.